Medrecords AI, described plainly
Short version: Medrecords AI is AI medical record review software for physicians: it turns a record file into a page-cited chronology and summary, and drafts reports from your notes. We make it, and we publish this site. It ranks 1st for IME and peer review chart work on our rubric, 2nd for QME and expert review, and it is the wrong pick for concurrent utilization review.
Limits: We scored every product from its own public pages on 2026-11-12 and did not run files through any of them, ours included. Prices and terms change; check the linked source before you buy.
What it does for a physician reviewer
- Reads the whole file, PDFs, scans and handwriting, and removes exact duplicate pages before billing.
- Builds a dated chronology and a summary where every output line cites its source page.
- Answers questions about the file with page cites, and flags records that look missing.
- Drafts reports from your notes, including IME reports. You review, edit and sign. The opinion is yours.
- Builds peer review packets that map the chart to the indicators your bylaws name, without scoring the practitioner. Details: peer review abstraction.
Speed: about 1 hour per case. Product pages: chronology, citations, IME report drafting, and the QME report checklist.
Price, trial and security, as of 2026-11-12
| Item | Terms |
|---|---|
| Record review | 10 cents per deduplicated page; 8 cents at 100,000 credits; 5 cents at 500,000 credits |
| A report | $10 (100 credits) |
| Subscription, seats, setup fee | None; credits never expire |
| Trial | 7 days, 1 case, up to 1,000 pages, no card, after you book a demo |
| Security | SOC 2 and HIPAA; a BAA signed at signup; customer records never train a model |
| On-premises | Annual license quoted on a call, for organizations that cannot send records out |
Source: the Medrecords AI pricing page. Its worked example: a 1,847-page file with duplicates removed bills $184.70.
Where it ranks on this site, and why
| Use case | Rank | Score | What decides it |
|---|---|---|---|
| IME | 1st | 11 of 12 | The report-drafting test; without it, 4th on the tie-break |
| QME | 2nd | 10 of 12 | Ties MediScan, loses because its trial needs a demo |
| Peer review, reviewer | 1st | 11 of 12 | The only tool here with a stated indicator-mapping product |
| Expert review | 2nd | 11 of 12 | Ties Superinsight, loses on the trial tie-break |
| Utilization review | Not ranked | n/a | No EHR connection, no criteria set |
What it does not do
- It is not an EHR, an ambient scribe or a clinical chart tool for care delivery.
- It does not retrieve records from providers. It reads the records you already have.
- It does not connect to InterQual or MCG, so it does not do concurrent utilization review.
- It does not run a peer review program: no case routing, scorecards or committee minutes.
- It does not schedule exams, file DWC forms, serve reports or bill fee schedules.
- It does not form opinions or sign anything. There is no self-serve public API; partner access is by request.
Who should pick something else
- A reviewer with 1 or 2 small files a month: InjuryMgmt ($99 for 1,500 pages) or OctopusLM (1,000 free pages) may cost less.
- Anyone who wants to start today without a call: OctopusLM, MediScan or InPractice.
- A hospital UR team or physician advisor: R1 Phare UM, InterQual AutoReview or Xsolis.
- A medical staff office running OPPE and FPPE: Crimson AI Provider Review, Riskonnect or symplr.
- A QME who wants QME report templates out of the box: ask Docura for a demo.
Try it on a file you know
Book a demo, then run 1 closed case for 7 days, up to 1,000 pages, with no card. Count missed facts and wrong pages against what you already know: book a Medrecords AI demo.